What Do You Need to Prove a Product Liability Claim? - Machi and Associates, P.C.

What Do You Need to Prove a Product Liability Claim?

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has found that each year, millions of Americans receive injuries from faulty, defective, or downright dangerous consumer products. By analyzing data pulled from emergency rooms and hospitals around the country, the CPSC can discover what products are causing an inordinate amount of injuries and then lean on manufacturers and retailers to recall these defective products.

If you've been injured by a consumer product, even if you haven't incurred medical expenses yet, you may have grounds for a product liability lawsuit. Below is information on the three types of product liability claims and what evidence you'll need to prove that a manufacturer or seller is liable.

Three Types of Product Liability Claims

Product liability claims are a subset of personal injury law and are further subdivided into three discrete categories: (1) defective manufacturing, (2) defective design, and (3) failure to warn.

Defective Manufacturing

When a product suffers from a defect that occurs after design and during the manufacturing or packaging process, the liability claim is based on defective manufacturing. In some cases, a defectively-manufactured product may be the only one like it in the store, while in other cases, a large-scale manufacturing defect could prompt a company to recall an entire shipment of a certain product.

Manufacturing defects can include things like jagged edges, unsecured screws/connectors that make the product unstable, or contamination.

Defective Design

Some products are dangerous because of an inherent flaw in the design. This can include things like electrical shorts that cause small appliances to overheat or melt, easy-to-open caps that allow children to access powerful narcotics, or top-heavy furniture that can easily tip over and injure someone (such as furniture that falls on children).

The "Big Tobacco " case brought against Phillip Morris is one of the largest defective design lawsuits in the US. A consumer who alleged cigarettes were to blame for her lung cancer recovered a record-breaking $28 billion judgment against the cigarette manufacturer (although this amount was later reduced to $28 million). Since the jury concluded that there was no safe human use for cigarettes and that the warning labels attached to each carton were insufficient to protect consumers, this was deemed a defective design case rather than a manufacturing defect or failure-to-warn situation.

Failure to Warn

The final category of product liability claims involves a manufacturer's failure to provide adequate warnings regarding how to use the product correctly. Some products, especially those that involve fire or require electricity, may be generally safe but still pose some danger to unaware users. By providing explicit warning labels or detailed instructions on the safe use of the product, manufacturers can protect themselves from liability claims if an injury does occur.

In other cases, a product may seem safe but have some hidden danger that's not readily apparent. Warnings are even more important in these situations, as the appearance of general safety can lull users into a false sense of security.

Proving Fault and Damages in a Product Liability Lawsuit

To establish fault under any of the three theories of product liability, you will need to be able to prove the following three factors:

  • The product was defectively manufactured, inherently dangerous, or the manufacturer failed to provide proper warnings;

  • These defects or failures to warn directly led to your injury; and

  • You suffered physical, emotional, and/or financial damages.

Each of these factors will need to be established through a sufficient amount of evidence. A failure to prove even one of the above elements will mean that the entire claim fails.

Available Damages

If you prevail in a product liability case, you could be entitled to both compensatory and punitive damages. Compensatory damages can include lost wages, medical bills, property damage, and other out-of-pocket expenses. Punitive damages are designed to punish the manufacturer and prevent future such incidents, so they won’t necessarily be related to the actual amount of damages you sustained. In some cases, the punitive damages awarded to a prevailing plaintiff far exceed the amount awarded in compensatory damages.

Common Product Liability Claims

Some common categories of product liability claims include:

  • Prescription drug deaths and injuries;

  • Mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure;

  • Silicosis caused by silica exposure;

  • Bowel perforations caused by a popular hernia patch;

  • Ovarian cancer caused by talcum powder; and

  • Toxic torts like chemical spills that can contaminate the water, soil, and air.

If you've suffered from one of the above conditions, or have another product liability claim you'd like to pursue, contact Ted Machi & Associates or visit our website for more information.

Small Firm - Big Results.

Built on Experience, Driven by Integrity, Delivering Results.

817-335-8880

Call today to schedule your FREE consultation.
Learn more about what our firm can do to serve you!

Areas of Practice

Machi & Associates, P.C., is passionate about advocating for the success of our clients! Let us help you with any of these areas:

Stack of lawbooks with a gavel on top illustrating the lawyers will work for their client.
Ted Machi, Arlington Bankruptcy Lawyer

Ted Machi Lead Attorney

Machi & Associates has been led by our founder, Ted Machi, who has helped the little guy in the DFW metroplex through effective, determined, professional representation. Ted Machi is Board Certified in Consumer Bankruptcy law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. He directs a team of attorneys who help people like yourself in areas such as Personal Injury, Bankruptcy and Disability Law. If you have another legal matter, such as deceptive trade, products liability, health or auto insurance denial or questions about personal injuries, we can help!

Daniel Wright, Arlington Bankruptcy Attorney

Daniel Wright Attorney

Daniel Wright has been a licensed attorney in the Fort Worth, Dallas, Arlington and Mansfield area for the past two decades. Initially practicing in multiple areas of law, Daniel has focused on Bankruptcy Law for the past 16 years, as well as Social Security Disability for the last 7. He chose these areas because he wanted to improve the lives of his clients and help them get through some incredibly difficult times. Daniel appreciates the small size of his firm because it keeps the legal process from becoming impersonal.

National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys
Who's Who Top 100 Attorneys
Better Business Beurau Rated
Top 100 Attorneys
© 2025 Machi & Associates, P.C. Principal office located in Arlington, Texas.